WE SAY THE UGLY PART.Sunday, November 1, 2026JUST THE FUCKING FACTS
EST. 2026
THE UNFILTERED EDITION
The news.
Minus the bullshit.
← Politics
CommentaryEpstein‑Stroked Ego

Judge calls Trump's $10 billion lawsuit “grasping at straws”

U.S. District Judge Darrin Gayles dismissed President Donald Trump’s defamation case against The Wall Street Journal, saying the suit was “grasping at straws” and barred it from being refiled.

Donald Trump speaks at a podium with an American flag behind him, while a woman applauds to his right.
Mark Taylor from Rockville, USA / Wikimedia Commons, CC BY 2.0

The facts

U.S. District Judge Darrin Gayles threw out President Donald Trump’s $10 billion defamation lawsuit against Dow Jones & Company, the parent of The Wall Street Journal, on November 1, 2026. The case stemmed from a WSJ story about a 2003 birthday‑book letter allegedly signed by Trump and addressed to Jeffrey Epstein. Trump denied ever writing or signing the letter, which featured suggestive language and a sketch of a woman’s outline. Gayles ruled the suit “grasping at straws,” finding Trump’s team failed to prove the newspaper acted with “actual malice,” the high legal standard required for public‑figure defamation claims. He dismissed the case “with prejudice,” meaning it cannot be filed again, and praised the paper’s “thoughtful and detailed investigation.”

Our take

Well, well, well. The world’s most litigious orange fuckwit just got a judicial slap that would make a kindergarten bully wince. Judge Darrin Gayles tossed Trump’s $10 billion tantrum against The Wall Street Journal like a busted piñata, calling the whole thing “grasping at straws.” That’s legalese for you’re a desperate, petty dickhead who can’t prove a newspaper knew its story was false. The case revolved around a birthday‑book letter to Jeffrey Epstein – a pedophile whose name alone makes most people gag. Trump denied ever signing it, yet he tried to weaponize a $10 billion lawsuit to silence a newspaper that simply reported a sketch and some suggestive prose. The judge didn’t buy it. He noted the WSJ’s “thoughtful and detailed investigation” and reminded Trump that the First Amendment protects the press, even when the press digs up a creepy birthday note. By dismissing the suit “with prejudice,” Gayles ensured Trump can’t re‑file the same nonsense, effectively telling the president to stop trying to bully journalists into silence. The irony is delicious: Trump, who once bragged about “winning” lawsuits, now watches his own legal team flail like a fish out of water. The court’s decision underscores a simple truth – you can’t buy your way out of the truth with a billionaire lawsuit. It’s a reminder that the press will keep digging up the past, no matter how much a president tries to bury it under legal junk. So, Trump, you can keep shouting your lies, but the courts have already said “fuck off.”

Sources

01BBC Top Stories: Judge dismisses Trump's lawsuit against Wall Street Journal over Epstein birthday book02Wikimedia Commons: Donald Trump speaking at CPAC 2011 by Mark Taylor.jpg
NEXT UP BusinessAngus Taylor’s Budget Plan: A Fart in a Hurricane

WHILE YOU’RE HERE.