WE SAY THE UGLY PART.Wednesday, October 21, 2026JUST THE FUCKING FACTS
EST. 2026
THE UNFILTERED EDITION
The news.
Minus the bullshit.
← Business
CommentaryBLOCK BUTTON BANDITS

Sextortion Relief Scam Extracted $60 Million While Mostly Just Blocking Attackers

The FTC says Digital Forensics Corp. and its CEO Dmitry Belkin defrauded sextortion victims of at least $60 million with false promises, then largely just blocked the attackers on social media and bought fake five‑star reviews from Uber drivers who never used the service.

The entrance to the Federal Trade Commission building, featuring large double doors with decorative metalwork depicting ships and an airplane, flanked by lanterns and topped with a stone carving of two figures.
Geraldshields11 / Wikimedia Commons, CC BY-SA 4.0

The facts

The Federal Trade Commission filed a complaint alleging that Digital Forensics Corporation LLC and its owner Dmitry Belkin misled victims of sextortion into paying at least $60 million. Victims were sold a “Phase 1” package priced between $1,499 and $20,000 that promised tracking the sextortionist, communicating with them, producing an investigative report and reporting the crime to law enforcement. The FTC says the company often failed to perform these services and instead simply blocked the sextortionist on the victim’s social‑media accounts, created fabricated chat transcripts and never contacted law enforcement. The complaint also alleges the firm suppressed negative reviews and generated thousands of fake positive reviews, including purchasing five‑star testimonials from Uber drivers who had never used the service. The FTC cited violations of the FTC Act, the Telemarketing Sales Rule, the Reviews and Testimonials Rule and the Gramm‑Leach‑Bliley Act. The complaint was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Ohio and the commission voted 2‑0 to pursue the case.

Our take

Fuck these scammers. The FTC’s complaint paints a picture of a predatory scheme that preys on people already terrified by blackmail and sells them a $1,500‑to‑$20,000 “Phase 1” package that, according to the agency, mostly amounts to hitting the block button on a social‑media profile – a task any victim could do with a thumb. The company then upsells a “Phase 2” service that never materializes, turning victims’ fear into a multi‑phase extortion racket. Their ads brag about tracking cyber criminals worldwide and delivering evidence to law enforcement, yet the FTC says they fabricated chat logs and investigative reports while advising victims not to block the attackers themselves, directly contradicting FBI guidance. To protect a tarnished reputation, Digital Forensics allegedly bought thousands of fake five‑star reviews, even paying Uber drivers who never used the service to post glowing testimonials. This sham operation not only siphoned at least $60 million from vulnerable consumers but also weaponized their terror for profit. The FTC’s 2‑0 vote to bring the case forward shows that regulators are finally cracking down on a scheme that turned extortion into a lucrative business model. The bottom line: these dickheads are nothing more than professional grifters masquerading as cyber‑crime fighters, and they deserve every ounce of the legal heat coming their way.

Sources

01Federal Trade Commission: FTC Sues Operator of Sextortion Relief Scheme for Misleading Consumers into Believing it Would Identify Criminals and End Sextortion Attacks02Wikimedia Commons: Federal Trade Commission Entrance Doorway.jpg
NEXT UP WorldMacron's Fuel-Begging Tour Upgraded to International Whine-Tasting

WHILE YOU’RE HERE.

Business/CHEAPEST SHIT THAT DOESN'T KILL YOU, ON PAPER

The VA Wrote Down That Late Surgery Packs Could Cancel Veterans' Surgeries, Then Said Getting Them Faster Had "no value"

The Court of Federal Claims just ordered the VA to redo its $98.5 million sterile-procedure-pack solicitation. The agency shopped by lowest price technically acceptable, wrote into its own acquisition plan that late packs could delay or cancel surgeries, and then told the court a faster delivery plan was worth "no value" to it. Senior Judge Loren A. Smith was not buying it.