The facts
On September 11, 2026, Shelly George filed a 67-page complaint with 199 separate paragraphs in federal court in Arizona, suing Brooke Rollins. The judge found that the complaint "appears to have been generated by artificial intelligence" because it "resembles other AI-generated complaints the court has encountered", which tells you something about how often this happens.
The complaint was not "a short and plain statement of the claim showing that the pleader is entitled to relief". It contained voluminous factual allegations that were difficult to follow, repetitive, and did not appear necessary, plus discussions of governing law and references to exhibits that were not attached. Despite its length, the judge wrote, it was not clear what claims George was even trying to assert. At the start she said she "brings this action principally under Title VII’s anti retaliation provision". A few pages later the claim was "hostile work environment". Then she combined the two into "retaliatory hostile work environment", a claim she appears to have invented by smashing the other two together.
The court ruled that the complaint qualifies as a forbidden "shotgun pleading": it "fails to separate into a different count each cause of action or claim for relief", and "It is not the job of the district courts to make sense of the pleading, to supply facts to support the claim, or to imagine the claims that might fit the facts". The complaint was dismissed.
George gets one more shot. By October 19, 2026, she must file an amended complaint of no more than 25 pages that is "not drafted using AI tools". The order states that "George must personally draft the allegations" and identify the claims she wishes to pursue. If she misses the deadline, the clerk will enter a judgment of dismissal with prejudice. Her motion to be allowed to file electronically was denied too.
Our take
Shelly George is a lazy, stupid cunt who thought a federal lawsuit was a fucking book report she could have a robot write at 2 a.m. She dumped 67 pages of AI-generated word-salad into a court, and the only thing she proved is that she’s too much of a useless prick to even know what she’s complaining about. The judge had to read 199 paragraphs of repetitive, incoherent bullshit and still couldn’t figure out what the fuck her claim was. That’s an achievement in incompetence so profound it should come with a trophy shaped like a melted hard drive.
This absolute clown didn’t just use AI, she used it so badly the judge has seen this shit before. The court has ‘encountered’ other AI complaints. That means there’s a whole fucking epidemic of grifters like George trying to pass off chatbot diarrhea as legal argument, and now judges are becoming experts at spotting the tell-tale signs of a lazy asshole. It’s a genre, and its hallmarks are citing exhibits that don’t exist and inventing claims like ‘retaliatory hostile work environment’ - a legal theory that sounds like a sandwich you’d order when you’re too high to decide between a burger and a pizza.
Now this dumb bitch is on court-mandated probation. She’s got to write it herself, in 25 pages or less, with her own goddamn human brain. No more robot ghostwriters. She even got her motion to file electronically denied, which is the judicial equivalent of the teacher making you write your apology note in crayon. If she misses the October 19 deadline, the case gets dismissed ‘with prejudice’, which is legal speak for ‘you fucked this up so royally we are never letting you try again’.
Somewhere, a relief committee for overworked AI language models is toasting their freedom from having to draft this talentless hack’s homework. Shelly George, however, has to sit down with a blank page and her own two brain cells and finally figure out what the fuck she’s even suing for. Good luck, you absolute waste of the court’s time. Try using your words this time, you useless dickhead.
