.jpg)
The facts
The X account @CNN posted on Tuesday, September 15, 2026, that FBI Director Kash Patel decided to remove bestiality as an automatic disqualifier for FBI job applicants. According to the post, Patel stated that the change was intended to protect victims of sex trafficking. This decision reportedly drew bipartisan disbelief on Tuesday. The source material indicates that the post is not independent proof of underlying claims and that all claims must remain clearly attributed to the source.
Our take
In a move that has left both Republicans and Democrats momentarily united in a chorus of 'excuse me?', FBI Director Kash Patel has announced that a history of fucking animals will no longer automatically keep you from getting a badge and a gun. His stated rationale? Protecting victims of sex trafficking. The mental gymnastics required to connect those dots are so severe they should be an Olympic event sponsored by a chiropractor.
Patel's logic, presumably scrawled on a napkin somewhere, suggests that by not immediately tossing an application because the candidate once got frisky with a farm animal, the Bureau is somehow being more sensitive to trafficking survivors. This is like arguing that to better support burn victims, fire departments should stop automatically disqualifying arsonists. The policy shift essentially opens the door for the FBI to welcome individuals whose idea of 'undercover work' might be a little too literal.
Imagine the next round of background checks. 'So, I see here a 2018 incident in a Nebraska barn... care to elaborate?' 'That was a misunderstanding, sir. I was deep undercover, gathering intel on... hay prices.' The sheer logistical nightmare of having to determine whether an applicant's bestiality was a one-time youthful indiscretion or a core part of their weekend routine is a HR department's worst fever dream.
This isn't broadening the talent pool; it's draining the swamp and then declaring the alligators are now eligible for federal pensions. The bipartisan disbelief isn't about being woke or prudish - it's about the bare-fucking-minimum expectation that the people investigating the nation's most serious crimes haven't already demonstrated a profound betrayal of societal and biological boundaries with a goat. Protecting trafficking victims is vital, but it's hard to see how hiring someone who might confuse a victim for a different kind of livestock advances that cause. It's less a recruitment reform and more a guarantee that the next FBI raid might need to be executed by Animal Control.
